Mainframe Software Price Surprises

IBM System z mainframe data centers buy a lot of software, and many data center managers pride themselves or negotiating the best price for each piece of software (or their procurement departments do). Ongoing mainframe software benchmarking based on actual prices paid, however, suggests this is not the case at all. The difference between the average price for a piece of mainframe software and what best-in-class (BiC) shops pay can amount to millions of dollars.

The results of mainframe software benchmarking from the Minneapolis-based ISAM Group may shock you. Since 1996 ISAM has collected over 7 million price data points from over 500 major companies, 13 leading outsourcing firms, six of the top ten largest states, and US and Canadian federal agencies.  Among its findings: BiC companies pay less than half what their peers pay for software regardless of data center size. It found, for example, there is an average difference of $4 million on what companies pay for software in each of the Top 10 functional categories.

The top 10 functional categories:

  1. OS
  2. DB/file mgt.
  3. Production mgt./system control
  4. Dev tools/language code generators
  5. OS application server
  6. DB/File mgt. utilities
  7. Dev tools/language extender
  8. Resource/performance mgt.
  9. Dev tools/test-debug
  10. DB access tools.

These ten functional categories account for 57% of the total software spend.

Not surprisingly, IBM’s software market share runs 50%-69% at the average data center, 80% at BiC data centers. Most data centers, Mike Swanson, ISAM head of research, can cut their software costs in half by becoming BiC, which happen to have higher concentrations of spend with IBM and CA. BiC shops spend about half of the average on software.

To become a BiC data center in terms of software cost start by focusing on the top 10 functional areas where the bulk of the software spend lies. The spend variance is greatest, Swanson adds, with the largest categories and with database access tools.

Then look closely at your mix of vendors. ISAM research shows that disparity in product pricing, changes in product mix, and variations in product deployment cause dramatic variations in costs by vendor. Those vendors with the greatest price variation offer the best opportunity for competitive replacement, which will reduce overall software spend.

Another trick of BiC data centers is to reduce core costs by reducing the environment. In software that means reducing the number of different software products deployed. Data centers typically have overlapping products and redundant functionality. A shop, for example, may have 10 database utilities when they really only need three. Similarly, ISAM found ample opportunities among data centers to trim the number of development tools they have without reducing functional capabilities.

And when deciding which products to cull, of course, look at vendor pricing. The difference between an average data centers and BiC data centers can be startling. For a monitoring tool, ISAM found that a small shop, under 1000 MIPS, might pay over $35 per cost unit on average for the product while a comparable size BiC shop would pay just $9 for the same product. The average large shop, one over 5000 MIPS, will pay almost $4 per cost unit for the same monitoring tool compared to $1.60 for a BiC shop.

Finally, avoid buying enterprise licenses, an approach favored by procurement. On the basis of cost per functionality, they are a bad deal. You are paying for convenience and flexibility. You are better off from an overall software licensing cost standpoint to carefully determine the specific capacity you need to license and pay only for that amount. This will require work to understand your exact requirements and usage patterns, but the payoff, as Swanson shows, can be substantial.

 

Tags: , , , , , ,

4 Responses to “Mainframe Software Price Surprises”

  1. David Eddy Says:

    Wow! I’m shocked.

    But on the other hand… as far as I know, IT is pretty much the only “profession” that doesn’t keep an inventory on it’s own work product.

    Perhaps we need to go back to the days when disk space would get tight & a green-bar report would be circulated. Anything you wanted/needed you had to initial otherwise it would be archived/deleted.

    A corollary to that… when a new DP manager (loooong before there were CIOs) came on board a standard technique was to commandeer a LARGE room. ALL reports (that was the only output) went to the room. To get a report people had to personally sign for them. After a few weeks there was a lot of unclaimed paper in the room & the DP manager had a solid idea on what was & was not important.

    I suspect such techniques aren’t as effective today when a 1TB disk (consumer, quantity one) costs $100.

  2. Jay Walker Says:

    I personally managed a Data Center for 15 years and worked with various software programs. I’d have to say that personally Nlyte was the easiest to work with. You can compare the specs yourself Data Center Software . I am sure there are plenty of options but I’d say they are the best.

  3. Ways to Lower IBM System z Costs « DancingDinosaur Says:

    […] and negotiating functionality from different ISVs. DancingDinosaur previously addressed this here when looking at the software tactics of best-in-class mainframe shops. It turns out there is a lot […]

  4. Roger Rogers Says:

    Great advice!

    Here’s another tip. Make sure you understand the marginal cost of growth. IBM software lowers the price-per-MIP as your system grows in several bands. Depending on where you are in growth your next growth band may be as much as 45% cheaper than your prior growth band.

    Contracts with tools vendors are often set for a narrow scope of MIPS leaving IT shops at the mercy of the vendor when growth is necessary. In many cases, this growth is very expensive. Leading to protracted negotiations, project delays, and the expense of managing capacity down until agreements are met.

    Is it expensive? Believe it or not, the cost of tools in many IT shops exceeds the cost of the ENTIRE stack of all other software (operating system, database, transaction management, security, …).

    Tools have become the tail that wags the dog, and management of these costs should be a high priority in any mainframe shop.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: